Ex-Trump spokesman Sean Spicer has described his former boss as “a unicorn, riding a unicorn over a rainbow” in his impending memoir.
The first spokesman of the Trump White House writes glowingly of the president but additionally contradicts his review of former marketing campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
“I don’t think we will ever again see a candidate like Donald Trump,” he says.
The Briefing: Politics, the Press and the President is because of be launched 24 July and has been praised by way of Mr Trump.
“His high-wire act is one that few could ever follow,” Mr Spicer writes, according to preview excerpts obtained by the Guardian.
“He is a unicorn, riding a unicorn over a rainbow… His ability to pivot from a seemingly career-ending moment to a furious assault on his opponents is a talent few politicians can muster.”
The e book contradicts Mr Spicer’s earlier feedback about Mr Manafort, who resigned in August 2016 amid allegations he had now not declared bills originating in former Soviet nations the place he had labored as a political lobbyist.
Mr Manafort was once jailed closing month and is charged with cash laundering, tax fraud, failing to sign in as a overseas agent, and obstruction of justice.
Mr Spicer had stated throughout a White House press convention that Mr Manafort “played a very limited role for a very limited amount of time”, echoing Mr Trump’s declare that his former marketing campaign chairman had most effective been with the marketing campaign “for a short period of time”.
“Paul brought a much-needed maturity to the Trump campaign,” Mr Spicer says, including that earlier than he joined “there was no semblance of a campaign structure, just a few, distraught, overworked people constantly barking into their phones.”
“Paul immediately set up and staffed the political and communications operations necessary to take on the Clinton machine.”
Mr Spicer additionally writes that the USA Department of Homeland Security met with the marketing campaign in October 2016 to guarantee them “that there was no way to infiltrate or manipulate the outcome of a national election”, according to the Daily Mail.
However, US intelligence has concluded that Russian hackers centered Democratic electronic mail servers, and dedicated different cyber-attacks so that you could help Mr Trump’s marketing campaign.
“Seeming to believe that Clinton would win, they implored us to publicly express confidence in the integrity of the voting process, system, and outcome,” writes Mr Spicer.