An nameless reader quotes the New York Times:
Lawmakers in no less than six states, together with California and New York, have presented expenses in fresh weeks that will forbid internet providers to block or slow down sites or on-line services and products. Legislators in different different states, together with North Carolina and Illinois, are weighing equivalent motion… By passing their very own regulation, the state lawmakers say, they might make sure that shoppers would in finding the content material of the selection, handle a variety of voices on-line and give protection to companies from having to pay charges to achieve customers.
And they may even have an impact past their states. California’s strict auto-emissions requirements, as an example, had been adopted through a dozen different states, giving California primary sway over the automobile business. “There tends to be a follow-on effect, particularly when something happens in a big state like California,” mentioned Harold Feld, a senior vp at a nonprofit shopper team, Public Knowledge, that helps net-neutrality efforts through the states. Bills have additionally been presented in Massachusetts, Nebraska, Rhode Island and Washington.
In addition, a consultant in Alaska’s legislature has additionally pre-filed regulation requiring the state’s ISPs to follow web neutrality, which shall be presented when the state legislature resumes on January 16th.
“The fresh FCC choice getting rid of web neutrality was a mistake that favors the big internet providers and those that need to prohibit the sorts of data a free-thinking Alaskan can get admission to,” consultant Scott Kawasaki advised an area information station. “That is not the Alaskan way, and I am hopeful my colleagues in the House and Senate will agree…”
The Independent additionally notes that Europe “is still strongly committed” to net neutrality.